Should road projects offer a return on investment?
First need to understand how to measure return.
Local Motion | September 12, 2013 | By James Bruckbauer
About the Author
The Regional Rider is a monthly update on the efforts to coordinate transit service in the six-county Grand Vision region. It’s published by the Michigan Land Use Institute’s transportation policy specialist, James Bruckbauer. For feedback, or to receive an emailed version every month, contact James at email@example.com or follow him on Twitter at @jimbruckb. Follow him on Twitter at @jimbruckb. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Pete Farmer: Nice to read about the big picture of music around here. I am sure the scene will only get bigger as TC grows. We plan on helping in our own little way with a small venue at our workshop. All procee...
- Pat Weber: The music tradition in Traverse City begins in its schools- the feeder system as it were. Traverse City Area Public Schools has had a long and rich music legacy in both vocal and instrumental instruct...
- Mario: Great article Hans Well written and an important message....
- Cory Johnston: Your reasons to vote NO are reason enough for me. This is 1960's mentality being used to fix 2015 and beyond problems. While mentioned, is there any guarantee that alternatives to one driver/one car w...
- Gerald Wilgus: Much of this is disingenuous rationalization in support of a "lesser of two evils" argument. This is how privatizing profit and socializing risk is maintained. We all agree that transportation inf...
Depends who you talk to. If you’re concerned about massive federal and state-level spending, you might want your taxpayer dollars to offer a return.
If a major transportation project doesn’t offer a return, it’s called “spending”—and sometimes spending is OK. But if a major transportation project offers a financial return and the government that’s paying for the project is able to cover the project’s costs and the services - like water and sewer - needed for the development around the project, then it’s an investment.
No return, no investment. But how communities should measure 'return on investment' is still unclear.
StrongTowns is a nonprofit dedicated to helping communities become more financially resilient by evaluating the true costs of infrastructure projects. Its founder, Chuck Marohn, says before we talk about the financial return of a project, we first need a common understanding of how to measure return.
Here’s a short video that compares how local officials typically think about return vs. the actual financial returns a project might provide.
You can find more short videos that describe how to calculate transportation's ROI here.
At a time when transportation budgets are crippled, and state and federal governments struggle to dig themselves out of major deficits, should we begin measuring the true return on transportation projects?
Right now, the state and local communities have very little evaluation criteria in place. Is it time for better measurements?
For a related story, check out my Forum in the Traverse City Record-Eagle about a revived proposal to build a major road bypass around Traverse City.
James Bruckbauer is the Michigan Land Use Institute’s transportation policy specialist. Reach him at email@example.com