 |

Citizens across
the Great Lakes basin were caught by surprise in 1998 when news
broke of an alarming business venture to scoop 156 million gallons
of water out of Lake Superior every year and ship it in tankers
to Asia. The plan, by the aptly named Nova Group, was like a brilliant
star. It illuminated vividly the growing global demand for clean,
fresh water and exposed how vulnerable the Great Lakes basin is
to world water markets.
But public
pressure prevailed in 1998. Across Michigan and other basin states,
the reaction was an emphatic: No! The Ontario Ministry
of Environment rescinded a permit it had issued the Nova Group.
Later, in 2000, Congress amended the 1986 Water Resources Development
Act, which governs transfers of water from the basin, to prohibit
such commercial diversions and exports of Great Lakes water without
permission from each of the eight Great Lakes governors.
As any astronomer
knows, however, novas eventually fade and give way to an even stronger,
more penetrating light. Enter the Perrier Group of America in 2001,
the bull of the bottled water market and a subsidiary of Nestle,
the worlds largest food company.
In August
2001, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality granted the
Perrier Group permission to pump 105 million gallons of water per
year from central Michigan and approved pipelines for more than
210 million gallons. Thats 54 million gallons more water per
year than the Nova Group would have taken ó a virtual supernova
in comparison.
Rather than
take a conservative approach to the Perrier Groups unusual
proposal, Michigan has encouraged the company to take the states
water. The Michigan Economic Development Corporation, a state agency,
has offered the Perrier Group a subsidy package of infrastructure
improvements, worker training, and property and education tax abatements
worth $9.6 million.
Urgent
Policy Action
The
Perrier Groups water venture into Michigan and the states
near-automatic permitting and encouragement of it have sparked a
new discussion about the states ability to protect the water
resources that sustain Michigans environment, economy, and
way of life. Without adequate water supply protections and clear
rules for withdrawals and exports, the state leaves itself open
not only to water marketing schemes from across the globe but also
to shortages and environmental damage at home.
Global consumption
of water is doubling every 20 years, more than twice the rate of
human population growth. According to the United Nations, more than
one billion people already lack an adequate supply of fresh drinking
water. An estimated three billion people will be living in water-stressed
countries in 2035, according to research by the World Bank.
Entrepreneurs
are eager to serve this demand in the absence of comprehensive and
committed efforts on the part of world governments to protect water
supplies by preventing pollution and promoting efficient water use.
Instead of safeguarding public water, international trade efforts
are actually embracing privatization of water and setting the stage
for global water markets.
Executive Summary:
More >>
|
 |
 |
| Eighty
percent of Lake Michigans water comes from groundwater
or groundwater-fed sources. |
CALL FOR WATER
SECURITY
From its seat in the center of the worlds largest body of
fresh water, Michigan has a significant role to play in protecting
citizens and the Great Lakes from efforts to privatize and commercialize
essential water resources.
Liquid Gold Rush describes current policy issues and
steps Michigan can take to ensure its water security.
|