Michigan land Use Instititute Home
Click for larger image and photo identities

WE THE PEOPLE
Broken: The Public Trust
“Compliance Assistance”: Rhetoric vs. Reality
Bulldozing Residents
How the Big Boys Get Away With It
Don’t Dump on Us
Needed: True Leadership
Invaded by Livestock Factories
Shut Up and Take Your Hazardous Waste Well
Electrifying Win in Monroe County’s Milan Township
Friends of the Crystal River Persist for 14 Years, and Win
People Power
Ending the Mismatch: Effective Organizing in Your Community
Planning and Zoning Basics
Guard Your Master Plans
Resources
TRANSPORTATION
New Direction Curbs Road-Building Binge
Dead End Road? State Stalling on Transportation Reform
LAND STEWARDSHIP
“Farmland Preservation” Proposal a Sprawl Subterfuge
Lansing Transfers Public Assets to Private Interests
GREAT LAKES SHORELINE
Legal Sandstorm
Good Laws Undermined
FROM THE FIELD
LETTERS TO THE INSTITUTE
DISPATCHES
MEMBER SNAPSHOT:
Detroit Visionary
AT THE INSTITUTE
Dynamic New Board Member
New Staff: Talented, Versatile
Annual Regional Meetings in September
Michigan Land Institute Home Key Issues Publications Tools For Action Other Resources Contact Us
All over Michigan, people who have worked hard to enact sound master plans and zoning ordinances — the essential guidelines for deciding what gets built and where — are watching local officials violate these legally enforceable planning rules on a regular basis. The result is more sprawl, more congestion, less open space, and growing civic disputes in dozens of townships and counties.
Fast-growing Meridian Township, east of Lansing, is typical of the clash between existing residents and new developments. Former Meridian Planning Commission chair Joan Guy recently analyzed how the township responds to developers’ requests to rezone land from residential to commercial uses. Between January 1997 and May 2000, the Meridian Township Board violated the township’s master plan in 61% of the rezoning requests it approved.
When local governments ignore the public’s will, they threaten the entire basis for local land-use decision making. Early in the 20th century, Michigan enacted planning and zoning laws to provide citizens and local governments with the authority to guide development in the best interest of the overall community. Master plans set out principles for improving quality of life and ensuring orderly growth. Zoning ordinances establish regulations that put the master plan into effect.
In recent years countless Michigan communities have updated both documents to protect neighborhoods, reduce congestion, and conserve natural green spaces. Development interests have attacked many of the new conservation-based land use plans, however, as regulations that threaten their bottom lines.
Giving in to this growth-at-any-cost strategy establishes precedents that undermine the validity of local land use laws. In a 1997 case involving Troy, for example, city officials refused to rezone a large parcel for a new mall because it violated the master plan. Oakland County Circuit Judge Denise Langford Morris, however, ruled in favor of the developer because the city had previously approved so many similar rezoning requests.
Citizen involvement is the last defense of local land use planning. Residents now must be more mindful than ever to hold officials accountable for making decisions that are consistent with the community’s values and development goals.

—K.S. and P.C.

Resources >>