Clean Energy / News & Views / Copenhagen Closeups: They Want Us to Lead
Copenhagen Closeups: They Want Us to Lead
Recent Comments
- Kenneth A.,: "Clean Energy" is Progressive Double Speak for taxpayer subsidized National Socialists pandering in the Lansing bubble for reams of OUR private wealth by statutory decree. The Federal Energy Securi...
- Christine Pardee: Michigan needs to be a leader in clean energy policy based on factual information. As we rebuild our economy. let our growth be based on energy policy that will be good for our future! ...
- Mike Tiedeck: A free market conservative culture embraces "creative destruction". This means that old, inefficient, polluting industries and power systems are inevitably doomed. Our state can be a leader in energ...
- Rob DeLay: Green roof projects for Michigan must include opportunities for individual homeowners,not just multi-home landholders. In particular, benefits and loan opps for farmers should be a high priority. Just...
- Sad but True: This gas plant in Holland is a good thing, but it is also should be a reminder that energy is complicated and requires a mix of generation assets. The real sad thing is that we as a country allowed t...
COPENHAGEN-Today I’m busy connecting with the team from 350.org, who all know Traverse City by name and are so happy to finally meet someone from a city that they have been hearing about for over a year, thanks to the good work of so many people who helped put TC350 on the map.
A common theme I’ve heard since arriving is a call for the United States and other developed countries to lead the way in cutting carbon emissions.
Over the decades, the U.S. has added more greenhouse gas emissions to our atmosphere than any other country. Even though China now ranks as the world’s top daily carbon emitter, many people want to know when U.S. negotiators will grab the wheel and steer this huge gathering toward a binding climate agreement.
There’s a lot of hope on this second summit day that the message about U.S. leadership is getting through, but it’s anyone’s guess as to what the outcome will be.
Among the throngs of people in Copenhagen right now are many from developing nations who are doing a lot of guessing about that.
Ben Vickers, a senior program officer from a Bangkok organization called the Center for People and Forests summed it up: “It’s really up to all of the delegates from both the developed and under-developed countries to work together. There’s a strong message coming form the nations in Southeast Asia and elsewhere in the world. What we’re here to find out is how they react to the information and how they use it.”
“Even though these civil societies of developing nations are not high up in the inner sanctum of the discussions,” he added, “their views are reflected and taken into consideration. But that does not necessarily mean they will be reflected in the final agreement.”
Meanwhile, the hope that Barack Obama’s presence for the summit’s last day will be just what it takes to strike a deal cannot be overstated.
There is so much going on here, so much to see and do, so many people all working together from every culture imaginable-it’s tough to conceive of anything other than a positive outcome from this monumental convening.
Brian Beachamp is a policy specialist for the Michigan Land Use Institute, and coordinates MLUI’s work with TC350.org. Reach him at Brian@mlui.org.
