A Thousand No’s on Forest Sale
- Kenneth A.,: "Clean Energy" is Progressive Double Speak for taxpayer subsidized National Socialists pandering in the Lansing bubble for reams of OUR private wealth by statutory decree. The Federal Energy Securi...
- Christine Pardee: Michigan needs to be a leader in clean energy policy based on factual information. As we rebuild our economy. let our growth be based on energy policy that will be good for our future! ...
- Mike Tiedeck: A free market conservative culture embraces "creative destruction". This means that old, inefficient, polluting industries and power systems are inevitably doomed. Our state can be a leader in energ...
- Rob DeLay: Green roof projects for Michigan must include opportunities for individual homeowners,not just multi-home landholders. In particular, benefits and loan opps for farmers should be a high priority. Just...
- Sad but True: This gas plant in Holland is a good thing, but it is also should be a reminder that energy is complicated and requires a mix of generation assets. The real sad thing is that we as a country allowed t...
Berry picking is one activity drawing Oscoda-area residents to state forestland that two local lawmakers and a developer think should be bulldozed into a golf course.
Citizens in Iosco and surrounding counties recently sent more than one thousand signatures to Gov. Jennifer Granholm opposing the attempted forced sale of 475 acres of state forest to a golf course developer.
“We sent approximately 1,200 signatures on the petitions,” said Oscoda Township resident Vicki Good. “I have petitions with 262 more signatures to send.”
The golf course developer, Boyd Stan Aldridge, already owns three golf courses in the township. He wants to build a fourth, but the acreage he wants, state foresters say, isn’t for sale because it is a locally valued piece of land.
That’s where several elected officials come in.
As we reported previously, two lawmakers, Rep. Joel Sheltrown (D-West Branch) and Senator Tony Stamas (R-Midland), are trying to force the state to sell the land to Mr. Aldridge. In fact, the legislators have introduced two bills to force the sale, saying it is a good idea for economic development.
With the fate of the legislation undetermined, Ms. Good and many others have personally wrote the governor, asking her to make sure the heavily used state forest area isn’t plowed over.
“We feel these bills set a very dangerous precedent of selling state land to whoever has the financial means and influence to force such a sale,” she said. “The DNR has been opposed to the sale of this land for many years. It appears the legislators who propose these bills feel they know more about land management than the trained people who work for the DNR.”
“Since our opposition to these bills has become public, we have met many people who currently use this land and are also opposed to the forced land sale,” she told the governor in her letter. “They enjoy the land in a variety of ways…. from hunting of deer, birds, etc. to hiking, berry picking, snowmobile riding, or just taking a ride through the woods to enjoy the quiet and view wildlife. Many of these people look forward to enjoying their interests with their children and grandchildren. They want their descendents to be able to enjoy this forest. Please do not encourage the legislature to take this enjoyment away from them.”
You can express your opinion on House Bill 5058 and Senate Bill 730. To contact the governor, click here. To contact House Speaker Andy Dillon, click here. To contact Senate leader Mike Bishop, click here.
MLUI is watching this one closely. We’ll update you when there is some action on these legislative bills.
Glenn Puit is a Michigan Land Use Institute policy specialist. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org.